🔗 Share this article

Avril Coleridge-Taylor always bore the pressure of her parent’s heritage. Being the child of Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, one of the prominent British musicians of the turn of the 20th century, her name was shrouded in the long shadows of bygone eras.

An Inaugural Recording

Earlier this year, I reflected on these shadows as I prepared to make the world premiere recording of the composer’s concerto for piano composed in 1936. With its emotional harmonies, heartfelt tunes, and bold rhythms, her composition will grant music lovers valuable perspective into how she – a composer during war who entered the world in 1903 – conceived of her existence as a woman of colour.

Legacy and Reality

Yet about legacies. One needs patience to adapt, to see shapes as they truly exist, to separate fact from misinterpretation, and I felt hesitant to face Avril’s past for a while.

I earnestly desired Avril to be following in her father’s footsteps. Partially, this was true. The rustic British sounds of Samuel’s influence can be heard in many of her works, including From the Hills (1934) and Sussex Landscape (1940). But you only have to examine the headings of her parent’s works to understand how he viewed himself as not just a flag bearer of UK romantic tradition but a voice of the African heritage.

At this point father and daughter appeared to part ways.

American society evaluated Samuel by the mastery of his art instead of the his ethnicity.

Parental Heritage

While he was studying at the Royal College of Music, Samuel – the offspring of a parent from Sierra Leone and a Caucasian parent – turned toward his African roots. Once the poet of color this literary figure visited the UK in that era, the aspiring artist eagerly sought him out. He composed Dunbar’s African Romances to music and the next year used the poet’s words for a musical work, Dream Lovers. This was followed by the choral composition that put Samuel on the map: Hiawatha’s Wedding Feast.

Based on the poet Longfellow’s The Song of Hiawatha, the piece was an worldwide sensation, notably for Black Americans who felt shared pride as the majority evaluated the composer by the excellence of his compositions rather than the his race.

Advocacy and Beliefs

Recognition failed to diminish Samuel’s politics. In 1900, he participated in the initial Pan African gathering in London where he made the acquaintance of the Black American thinker this influential figure and saw a range of talks, covering the subjugation of Black South Africans. He remained an advocate throughout his life. He maintained ties with trailblazers for equality including this intellectual and the educator Washington, spoke publicly on equality for all, and even discussed issues of racism with the American leader during an invitation to the White House in the early 1900s. In terms of his art, Du Bois recalled, “he made his mark so prominently as a musician that it will long be remembered.” He died in that year, at 37 years old. But what would Samuel have made of his daughter’s decision to work in the African nation in the that decade?

Issues and Stance

“Daughter of Famous Composer gives OK to S African Bias,” appeared as a heading in the African American magazine Jet magazine. Apartheid “seems to me the right policy”, Avril told Jet. When pushed to clarify, she revised her statement: she was not in favor with this policy “in principle” and it “could be left to work itself out, overseen by benevolent residents of diverse ethnicities”. Were the composer more aligned to her parent’s beliefs, or from the US under segregation, she might have thought twice about apartheid. Yet her life had protected her.

Background and Inexperience

“I have a British passport,” she said, “and the government agents never asked me about my race.” So, with her “fair” appearance (according to the magazine), she traveled within European circles, supported by their praise for her deceased parent. She delivered a lecture about her father’s music at the Cape Town university and conducted the broadcasting ensemble in Johannesburg, featuring the heroic third movement of her Piano Concerto, subtitled: “Dedicated to my Father.” Although a confident pianist personally, she did not perform as the lead performer in her concerto. Rather, she always led as the maestro; and so the apartheid orchestra performed under her direction.

The composer aspired, in her own words, she “may foster a change”. However, by that year, the situation collapsed. After authorities discovered her African heritage, she had to depart the nation. Her UK document didn’t protect her, the diplomatic official urged her to go or face arrest. She returned to England, feeling great shame as the extent of her innocence was realized. “This experience was a painful one,” she stated. Increasing her embarrassment was the 1955 publication of her unfortunate magazine feature, a year after her forced leaving from the country.

A Familiar Story

As I sat with these legacies, I perceived a recurring theme. The narrative of being British until it’s challenged – one that calls to mind troops of color who fought on behalf of the UK during the World War II and survived only to be denied their due compensation. Including those from Windrush,